<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nice Little Tutorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joelandkaren.com/learningrails/archives/10/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joelandkaren.com/learningrails/archives/10</link>
	<description>Joel Greenberg's Experience in Learning Web Development with Ruby on Rails</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:01:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joelg</title>
		<link>http://joelandkaren.com/learningrails/archives/10/comment-page-1#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>joelg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelandkaren.com/learningrails/archives/10#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Paul - I&#039;m running AWAY from PERL.  Between the two, Ruby is so much easier.  I find PERL needlessly cryptic.  

Now, I don&#039;t program every day, but I can see why PERL is popular.  It does so much that&#039;s useful and has the vast CPAN library.  But, I think Ruby is easier to learn and does much of the same work.  

The issue for me isn&#039;t Ruby, it&#039;s Rails.  I find Ruby a language that fits well with the way I think.  As I&#039;m reading &quot;Ruby for Rails&quot; by David Black, I&#039;m beginning to understand Rails better as well.

I think the problem early on for me was that &quot;Agile Web Development with Rails&quot; didn&#039;t get me where I needed to go with understanding Rails.  If the authors user test it and make changes, then I think it&#039;d be a dynamite book.

I read through Why&#039;s books and liked it, but it doesn&#039;t touch on Rails, if I recall.  I do think the Pickaxe book does a good job as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul &#8211; I&#8217;m running AWAY from PERL.  Between the two, Ruby is so much easier.  I find PERL needlessly cryptic.  </p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t program every day, but I can see why PERL is popular.  It does so much that&#8217;s useful and has the vast CPAN library.  But, I think Ruby is easier to learn and does much of the same work.  </p>
<p>The issue for me isn&#8217;t Ruby, it&#8217;s Rails.  I find Ruby a language that fits well with the way I think.  As I&#8217;m reading &#8220;Ruby for Rails&#8221; by David Black, I&#8217;m beginning to understand Rails better as well.</p>
<p>I think the problem early on for me was that &#8220;Agile Web Development with Rails&#8221; didn&#8217;t get me where I needed to go with understanding Rails.  If the authors user test it and make changes, then I think it&#8217;d be a dynamite book.</p>
<p>I read through Why&#8217;s books and liked it, but it doesn&#8217;t touch on Rails, if I recall.  I do think the Pickaxe book does a good job as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sweeney</title>
		<link>http://joelandkaren.com/learningrails/archives/10/comment-page-1#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sweeney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelandkaren.com/learningrails/archives/10#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Okay, I&#039;m not stalking you, I swear. Just running head-first into some Rails issues myself, and wanted to comisserate.

As far as Ruby goes, I&#039;d say you might want to play around a bit with Perl, which I&#039;ve found has very similar syntax. Additionally, there&#039;s a great (and free) PDF book floating around, called &quot;Why&#039;s Poignant Guide to Ruby&quot; which is a good overview of the underlying language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;m not stalking you, I swear. Just running head-first into some Rails issues myself, and wanted to comisserate.</p>
<p>As far as Ruby goes, I&#8217;d say you might want to play around a bit with Perl, which I&#8217;ve found has very similar syntax. Additionally, there&#8217;s a great (and free) PDF book floating around, called &#8220;Why&#8217;s Poignant Guide to Ruby&#8221; which is a good overview of the underlying language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
